Fasoracetam (NS-105)
Our depth — beyond the mirror
Deeper analysis, verdict reasoning, and per-archetype recommendations from our research team.
▸ Our verdict OPTIONAL-ADD LOW
Mechanism is genuinely interesting (slow-acting glutamate-system rebalancer rather than acute stimulant or GABA agonist), the Nippon Shinyaku safety record is long, and it has the only credible pediatric pivotal-track development of any racetam — but the clinical efficacy story is mixed (one positive open-label adolescent ADHD signal in mGluR-mutation carriers, one fully negative randomized Phase 2 in unselected ADHD, one underpowered signal-finding crossover in 22q11.2DS that missed p<0.05). For Dylan-archetype with no mGluR mutation phenotype and no anxiety pathology, the upside ceiling is "subtle anxiolytic + mild cognitive smoothing on a long-acting GABA-B/mGluR axis," which does not displace anything in V4/V5. Verdict would upgrade to STRONG-CANDIDATE if Nobias Phase 2b/3 hits in 22q11.2DS AND independent biohacker corpus replicates an anxiolytic effect at 5–30 mg in non-mutation-carriers; would downgrade to SKIP-FOR-NOW if any further controlled trial fails or if the GABA-B upregulation rebound profile turns out to mirror phenibut withdrawal in chronic-dosing biohackers.
▸ Decision matrix by user profile Per-archetype
| Archetype | Verdict | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
Dylan20-30, brain-priority, high cognitive workload (Dylan-archetype) | OPTIONAL-ADD | PRN niche, verdict-confidence LOW. Subtle anxiolytic + motivation-neutral profile at 5-30 mg AM does not displace anything in V4/V5. Mechanism is interesting and safety record at biohacker doses is reasonable, but the upside ceiling is "subtle background anxiolytic" — if Dylan has specific high-anxiety days (sales-call surges, sparring weeks), it's a defensible PRN tool at $25-50/mo. Re-evaluate after 23andMe results (June 2026) — if mGluR-network variants present, upgrade consideration to a 4-week consistent-dosing trial. |
30-50, executive maintenance | OPTIONAL-ADD | Same logic — subtle anxiolytic for high-stress periods, no displacement of established stack components. |
50+, mild cognitive decline | SKIP-FOR-NOW | Original vascular-dementia program failed Phase 3. No MCI/AD efficacy data. Other compounds (cerebrolysin, donepezil, memantine) are better-evidenced for this population. |
ADHD with confirmed mGluR-network mutations | STRONG-CANDIDATE | pending FDA approval / further controlled trial. This is the indication where the mechanism predicts the largest effect, the open-label Elia 2018 signal was strongest, AND where ASCEND failed to replicate — net evidence is genuinely mixed but the population has the most plausible responder mechanism. If a controlled trial confirms genotype-specific efficacy, this becomes the clearest use case. |
22q11.2 deletion syndrome | STRONG-CANDIDATE | pending Phase 3. Nobias active development, FDA Orphan + RPDD designations, signal-finding Phase 2 hit on key secondary (p=0.07). Not Dylan-relevant but the highest-evidence current use case. |
Anxiety-prone (general/social anxiety, sub-clinical) | OPTIONAL-ADD | Mechanism is anxiolytic-aligned, biohacker corpus consistent, dose range low and reasonably safe. Worth a 4-week trial as adjunct to behavioral interventions for someone with established sub-clinical anxiety pattern. Buspirone, hydroxyzine, or SSRIs are higher-evidence first-line for clinical anxiety; fasoracetam is a niche off-label option. |
High athletic load, tested status | NEUTRAL | Not on WADA prohibited list 2026. Investigational compound — could be added without notice. Research-chem identity is sample-failure liability for tested athletes. |
Sleep-disordered (insomnia, late chronotype) | SKIP-FOR-NOW | Cholinergic enhancement profile is mildly alerting; AM dosing only. Not a sleep aid despite GABA-B upregulation (no acute GABA-B agonism, so no acute sedation). |
Recovery-focused (post-injury, post-illness) | NEUTRAL | No mechanistic argument for recovery enhancement. Cerebrolysin, BPC-157, citicoline are better-evidenced for brain-recovery angle. |
Strength/anabolic-focused | NEUTRAL | / not applicable. No anabolic mechanism. No documented athletic-performance impact at biohacker doses. |
- Dylan20-30, brain-priority, high cognitive workload (Dylan-archetype)OPTIONAL-ADD
PRN niche, verdict-confidence LOW. Subtle anxiolytic + motivation-neutral profile at 5-30 mg AM does not displace anything in V4/V5. Mechanism is interesting and safety record at biohacker doses is reasonable, but the upside ceiling is "subtle background anxiolytic" — if Dylan has specific high-anxiety days (sales-call surges, sparring weeks), it's a defensible PRN tool at $25-50/mo. Re-evaluate after 23andMe results (June 2026) — if mGluR-network variants present, upgrade consideration to a 4-week consistent-dosing trial.
- 30-50, executive maintenanceOPTIONAL-ADD
Same logic — subtle anxiolytic for high-stress periods, no displacement of established stack components.
- 50+, mild cognitive declineSKIP-FOR-NOW
Original vascular-dementia program failed Phase 3. No MCI/AD efficacy data. Other compounds (cerebrolysin, donepezil, memantine) are better-evidenced for this population.
- ADHD with confirmed mGluR-network mutationsSTRONG-CANDIDATE
pending FDA approval / further controlled trial. This is the indication where the mechanism predicts the largest effect, the open-label Elia 2018 signal was strongest, AND where ASCEND failed to replicate — net evidence is genuinely mixed but the population has the most plausible responder mechanism. If a controlled trial confirms genotype-specific efficacy, this becomes the clearest use case.
- 22q11.2 deletion syndromeSTRONG-CANDIDATE
pending Phase 3. Nobias active development, FDA Orphan + RPDD designations, signal-finding Phase 2 hit on key secondary (p=0.07). Not Dylan-relevant but the highest-evidence current use case.
- Anxiety-prone (general/social anxiety, sub-clinical)OPTIONAL-ADD
Mechanism is anxiolytic-aligned, biohacker corpus consistent, dose range low and reasonably safe. Worth a 4-week trial as adjunct to behavioral interventions for someone with established sub-clinical anxiety pattern. Buspirone, hydroxyzine, or SSRIs are higher-evidence first-line for clinical anxiety; fasoracetam is a niche off-label option.
- High athletic load, tested statusNEUTRAL
Not on WADA prohibited list 2026. Investigational compound — could be added without notice. Research-chem identity is sample-failure liability for tested athletes.
- Sleep-disordered (insomnia, late chronotype)SKIP-FOR-NOW
Cholinergic enhancement profile is mildly alerting; AM dosing only. Not a sleep aid despite GABA-B upregulation (no acute GABA-B agonism, so no acute sedation).
- Recovery-focused (post-injury, post-illness)NEUTRAL
No mechanistic argument for recovery enhancement. Cerebrolysin, BPC-157, citicoline are better-evidenced for brain-recovery angle.
- Strength/anabolic-focusedNEUTRAL
/ not applicable. No anabolic mechanism. No documented athletic-performance impact at biohacker doses.
▸ Subjective experience (deep)
At 5-30 mg AM (Dylan-archetype dose range):
- Onset: detectable subtle effect within ~30-60 min on first dose; full subjective profile takes 5-14 days of consistent dosing to express (chronic-upregulation mechanism). Single doses are often described as "barely noticeable."
- Peak window: ~2-4 h post-dose; tapers over 4-6 h matching the half-life.
- Characteristic effects (per consistent user reports):
- Mild anxiolytic — the dominant effect. "Mental quiet," reduced reactivity to social/work stress, less rumination. Not sedating — clearheaded calm rather than benzodiazepine-like.
- Motivation: neutral. Does not increase drive, does not blunt it. Distinct from anxiolytics that flatten affect (some SSRI patterns) — fasoracetam users typically retain emotional range.
- Cognitive smoothing rather than enhancement. Easier to think clearly under load, but no acute focus surge or working-memory boost. Subtle background effect.
- No euphoria, no stimulation, no tolerance crash. Genuinely "background" pharmacology.
- What it does NOT do (despite some marketing copy): does not increase deep-work output the way pramiracetam/phenylpiracetam are reported to; does not produce mood elevation the way aniracetam is reported to; does not provide acute stress-resilience the way ashwagandha or selank do; does not enhance motivation the way bromantane or low-dose modafinil do.
- Variability: very high. Some users report no effect at any dose; some report meaningful anxiolytic effect at 5-10 mg; the "responder rate" appears to be roughly 40-60% based on forum reports, consistent with the genotype-specific mechanism (mGluR-network mutation carriers more likely to respond).
Honest summary for Dylan: at 5-30 mg AM, expect a subtle background anxiolytic over 1-2 weeks, with no acute "feel," no motivation effect, no cognitive surge. If you don't notice anything by week 3 of consistent dosing, you're probably a non-responder. Clean to discontinue at this low dose range — withdrawal concerns are dose- and duration-dependent.
▸ Tolerance + cycling deep dive
- Tolerance buildup: minimal at low biohacker doses, modest at clinical doses. No tolerance documented in the Elia 2018 study (4 weeks at 400 mg BID); biohacker reports at 10-30 mg suggest stable response over weeks. The chronic-upregulation mechanism actually increases response over the first 1-2 weeks for most responders.
- Recommended cycle: 5 days on / 2 days off is the biohacker convention (Wholistic Research, Mind Lab Pro, etc.), but the half-life and chronic-upregulation mechanism mean this pattern doesn't meaningfully reset receptor density. A more defensible pattern: 2-4 weeks on / 1-2 weeks off for any consistent-dosing protocol, or pure PRN dosing (every-few-days only) to avoid the upregulation pattern entirely.
- Reset protocol if needed: 2-week off-drug window for full receptor-density normalization based on rat data. Taper 20→10→5→0 mg over 5-7 days if used daily >2 weeks to mitigate rebound anxiety.
▸ Stacking deep dive
Synergistic with
- citicoline 500 mg (Dylan's V4 daily) — fasoracetam upregulates cortical ACh release, citicoline provides choline substrate. Mitigates the headache/brain-fog pattern reported by some users. Already in Dylan's stack — no additional action needed.
- alpha-GPC 300 mg — alternative choline donor, more bioavailable for ACh synthesis. Stack only if not already on citicoline.
- L-theanine 200 mg — already in Dylan's V4. Theanine adds AMPA/glutamate-system modulation in the calming direction and is the classic anxiolytic-stack partner. No documented interaction with fasoracetam, mechanistically convergent for anxiolysis.
- rhodiola 250 mg — already in Dylan's V4. Adaptogenic anxiolytic with distinct mechanism (HPA-axis, monoamine modulation). Convergent goals, distinct receptors, no documented interaction.
- magnesium glycinate / threonate — both in Dylan's V4. Magnesium is a low-affinity NMDA modulator and GABA-A potentiator; theoretically convergent on the calming-glutamate / enhanced-GABA axis fasoracetam targets.
Avoid stacking with
- phenibut — HARD AVOID. Documented near-fatal case report: bradycardia HR=36, GCS=3, GABA-B rebound psychosis on day 2. Mechanism: fasoracetam GABA-B upregulation amplifies phenibut GABA-B agonism. Do not use concurrently at any dose, do not use within 2 weeks of phenibut discontinuation.
- picamilon — niacin-conjugated GABA, GABA-B activity. Same upregulation-amplifies-agonism logic as phenibut. Avoid concurrent.
- GHB / GABA-B agonists generally — same mechanism; not relevant for Dylan but worth flagging.
- TAK-653 — both modulate the glutamate system. Fasoracetam upregulates mGluR autoreceptors (presynaptic brake); TAK-653 amplifies AMPA-receptor activity (postsynaptic agonist potentiation). Mechanistically opposing in some respects, convergent in others — net effect unpredictable. Hold one during a trial of the other.
- neboglamine — NMDA glycine-site PAM. Glutamate-system modulator in a different direction. Avoid stacking with fasoracetam during a trial of either compound (signal disambiguation + multiplied unknowns).
- memantine — NMDA antagonist. Mechanism partially opposed to fasoracetam's mGluR-upregulation pattern. No clinical data on the combination. Avoid concurrent.
- agmatine — modest NMDA antagonist + nNOS modulator. Same disambiguation concern as memantine. Hold during a fasoracetam trial.
- Other racetams (piracetam, aniracetam, pramiracetam, oxiracetam, phenylpiracetam, coluracetam, nefiracetam) — mechanism overlap is partial; no specific safety contraindications, but stacking multiple racetams produces diffuse cholinergic enhancement and complicates signal disambiguation. Run one racetam at a time during trials.
- High-dose benzodiazepines / barbiturates — additive GABAergic effect. Theoretical, not Dylan-relevant.
- Baclofen — direct GABA-B agonist. Same mechanism class as phenibut concern, less recreational potential but same upregulation-amplifies-agonism issue.
Neutral / safe co-administration (best current understanding)
- V4 OTC stack (citicoline, NAC, magnesium glycinate/threonate, fish oil/DHA, phosphatidylserine, curcumin, rhodiola, L-theanine, glycine/L-tryptophan, D3+K2, beta-alanine, vitamin C, creatine) — no flagged interaction. The cholinergic stack overlap is convergent (citicoline supports ACh demand from fasoracetam-induced ACh release).
- Modafinil 100-200 mg AM — orthogonal mechanism (DAT/NET, histaminergic, orexinergic vs glutamate/GABA/cholinergic). No documented interaction. Theoretically modafinil's stimulation could partly cancel fasoracetam's anxiolysis, but mechanisms are distinct — many biohacker reports of stacking the two without issue.
- Bromantane 50 mg AM — DA-synthesis upregulation, no direct overlap with fasoracetam mechanism. Reasonable stack-mate for someone wanting cognitive enhancement + anxiolysis.
- Adamax / Semax / Selank (Russian peptides) — distinct mechanisms (regulatory peptides, BDNF/DA modulation). No documented interactions.
- BPC-157, TB-500, GHK-Cu (peripheral peptides) — different system entirely, no interactions.
- Cerebrolysin — neurotrophic peptide cocktail, BDNF/NGF mimicry. No documented interaction with fasoracetam; mechanistically distinct.
▸ Drug interactions deep dive
- CYP enzymes: fasoracetam is largely renally cleared as unchanged parent, with minimal hepatic metabolism. Therefore, minimal CYP-mediated drug-drug interactions expected. No published CYP3A4/2D6 inhibition or induction data.
- Renal-clearance interactions: drugs that affect renal tubular secretion (probenecid, NSAIDs at chronic high dose, some antibiotics) could theoretically alter fasoracetam clearance. Not clinically documented. Not relevant for Dylan's stack.
- Oral contraceptives: no documented interaction (no CYP3A4 induction expected from a renally-cleared compound).
- Antidepressants (SSRI/SNRI): no documented interaction. Some biohacker reports of stacking fasoracetam with SSRIs without issue. Mechanistically distinct.
- Stimulants (amphetamine, methylphenidate, modafinil): no documented interaction. The chronic-upregulation mechanism does not predict acute interaction with monoamine releasers.
- Alcohol: GABA-B upregulation may modestly enhance sedative effects of alcohol. Not clinically characterized; biohacker convention is to avoid heavy alcohol on fasoracetam. Not relevant for Dylan (zero alcohol baseline).
▸ Pharmacogenomics
- GRM1, GRM2, GRM3, GRM5, GRM7, GRM8 (mGluR1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8 receptor genes) — the central PGx hypothesis for fasoracetam efficacy. Elia 2018 selected adolescents with mGluR network mutations specifically and reported genotype-specific response. ASCEND tested this hypothesis in a controlled setting and failed to replicate — even the genotype-positive arm did not separate from placebo. Net status: the genotype-specific responder hypothesis is not validated by controlled-trial data. Worth checking 23andMe results in June 2026 for any clear loss-of-function variants in the mGluR network, but absence does not predict response failure (and presence does not predict success — see ASCEND).
- 22q11.2 deletion — the active Nobias indication. Not relevant to Dylan (no 22q11.2DS).
- CYP2D6 / CYP3A4 polymorphisms: minimal clinical impact expected given renal-clearance dominance.
- Practical: pharmacogenomic data is the single open question that could refine the verdict. Worth re-checking after Dylan's 23andMe results land in June 2026 — specifically looking for any reported pathogenic/likely-pathogenic variants in GRM1-8 or downstream glutamatergic signaling genes (GRIA1-4, GRIN1-2B, SHANK3, etc.). Absence of such variants pushes verdict toward SKIP-FOR-NOW; presence of clear variants would tilt toward STRONG-CANDIDATE pending Phase 3.
▸ Sourcing deep dive
| Path | Vendor | Cost | Reliability | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research-chem (powder) | Kimera Chems (kimerachems.co) | ~$25-50/30g powder | Medium | Dylan's accepted vendor per profile. HPLC purity claim, COA available. CAS 110958-19-5. |
| Research-chem (powder) | Amino USA | ~$30-45/30g | Medium | Third-party batch testing claim. |
| Research-chem (capsules) | Various nootropic vendors (RUPharma occasional, Nootropics Depot historical) | ~$30-50/bottle of 30 caps × 20mg | Medium | Capsule format eliminates analytical-balance dosing requirement; convenience premium. |
| Research-chem (powder, lab-grade) | Benchchem, MedChemExpress, BOC Sciences | $variable per gram | Higher (institutional) | Sells to academic labs; not consumer-friendly without institutional account. |
| Avoid | Everychem | — | Blacklisted | Per Dylan's vendor blacklist. |
| Avoid | Random reseller / unverified site | — | Untestable | At biohacker dose (5-30 mg) the margin for vendor mislabeling is wider than for TAK-653, but COA verification still recommended. |
| Clinical | None available | — | — | Nobias trials are pediatric-only and 22q11.2DS-restricted. No clinical access path for healthy adults. |
Cost estimate (Dylan use case, 10-20 mg AM PRN, ~10-15 doses/month): ~$25-50/month, well under the $40 V5-additions ceiling. PRN use makes this one of the more cost-efficient additions.
Critical sourcing notes:
- Powder format requires analytical balance for accurate 5-30 mg dosing. Volumetric dosing (dissolving in distilled water for ~1 mg/mL) is a workable alternative.
- CAS verification — fasoracetam CAS 110958-19-5. Vendor copy that omits CAS number is a red flag.
- Identity check at higher doses — at 30+ mg/day the margin for mislabeling becomes more relevant. COA verification is recommended.
- Customs / legal — fasoracetam is not scheduled in the US (Schedule 4 / Rx-only in Australia, no equivalent US restriction). Personal-import legality is gray-area but US FDA generally does not pursue research-chem personal use. Possession/use at user's risk.
▸ Biomarkers to track (deep)
Baseline (before starting)
- GAD-7 (anxiety) + PHQ-9 (depression) — if anxiety is the target, establish 2-week pre-baseline.
- Subjective cognitive output (deep-work session count, sales-call quality, sparring read) — 2-week pre-baseline.
- Sleep onset latency, sleep quality, sleep duration — Oura/Whoop, 2-week pre-baseline.
- Resting heart rate, blood pressure — basic cardiovascular safety.
- Liver panel, CBC, BMP (especially serum creatinine for renal clearance) — baseline before any novel research-chem with renal-dominant clearance.
- 23andMe mGluR-network gene status (when results land June 2026) — GRM1-8, GRIA1-4, GRIN1-2B, SHANK3 variants. Predictive of responder phenotype; absence doesn't preclude response but presence increases prior probability.
During use (week 2-4)
- GAD-7 + PHQ-9 weekly.
- Subjective cognitive/training output weekly.
- Sleep metrics daily.
- HR/BP weekly.
- Subjective: any GI distress, headache pattern, mood drift, sleep changes, training subjective changes.
Post-cycle / discontinuation watch
- GAD-7 + PHQ-9 at days 3, 7, 14 post-discontinuation — rebound anxiety watch.
- Sleep onset latency — rebound insomnia is an early-discontinuation signal.
- Subjective irritability / mood drift — chronic-dosing rebound pattern.
▸ Controversies / open debates Live debate
- The genotype-specific responder hypothesis is the central unresolved question. Elia 2018 said yes (open-label signal in mGluR-mutation carriers). ASCEND 2018 said no (failed to separate from placebo even in genotype-positive arm). Nobias 2023 in 22q11.2DS said maybe (signal-finding p=0.07 on key secondary in a different genetic substrate). The honest summary: the clinical evidence does not currently support a strong genotype-specific efficacy claim, and the biohacker corpus that cites Elia 2018 without ASCEND is presenting cherry-picked evidence. A future Nobias Phase 2b/3 in 22q11.2DS could resolve this for that specific population; broader generalization to mGluR-mutation ADHD remains unsupported.
- Clinical development pace: 35+ years and counting. Nippon Shinyaku started in the late 1980s. Three companies after that (NeuroFix → Aevi → Avalo) failed to advance to approval. Nobias is the fourth attempt. Each failure has narrowed the indication (vascular dementia → ADHD with mGluR mutations → 22q11.2DS neuropsychiatric symptoms). The current Phase 2b/3 path is the narrowest indication yet and may yet succeed for that specific rare-disease population — but the broader cognitive/anxiolytic claim is implicitly being abandoned by the development pipeline. This pattern is informative: if the compound had broad efficacy in cognition or anxiety, someone would have demonstrated it in 35 years. The absence of broad clinical signal is itself a finding.
- GABA-B upregulation vs phenibut withdrawal pattern. The biohacker community has converged on "fasoracetam is safe alone but dangerous with phenibut" — which is correct based on the published case report. The deeper question is whether fasoracetam alone, used chronically, produces phenibut-like withdrawal. Reports are mixed. The mechanism (upregulation, not direct agonism) predicts milder rebound than phenibut, but a meaningful minority of long-term users report severe rebound. Treat as a real risk at >4 weeks daily dosing, manage with taper.
- Biohacker dose range vs clinical dose range — 20-40× discrepancy. Every clinical signal (positive or negative) is at 100-800 mg/day. Biohacker dosing is 5-30 mg/day. This means:
- The biohacker dose has never been tested for efficacy in a controlled setting.
- Reported anxiolytic effects at 5-30 mg may be real (mGluR upregulation has a sub-linear dose-response in rats — much lower doses than the clinical range produce receptor density changes), expectancy, or noise.
- Biohacker safety reports at 5-30 mg do not validate safety at clinical doses, and clinical safety at 100-800 mg does not validate efficacy at 5-30 mg. The two evidence bases barely overlap.
- Mechanism vs. clinical mismatch. The mechanism (mGluR upregulation, GABA-B upregulation, cholinergic enhancement) predicts strong effects on glutamate-GABA balance. The clinical record (failed Phase 3 in vascular dementia, failed Phase 2 in ADHD, signal-finding only in 22q11.2DS) does not match the mechanistic prediction. Either the mechanism is right and the trials were under-powered/wrong-population, or the mechanism doesn't translate at therapeutic doses, or the clinically meaningful effect is much smaller than the mechanism predicts. No way to resolve from current evidence.
- Western biohacker corpus vs. Russian/Eastern research. Unlike most racetams, fasoracetam was developed in Japan (Nippon Shinyaku) and the original Phase 3 vascular dementia data is Japanese. Western (US-led) development has been the second life of the compound. The Japanese clinical trials failed; this is not a "Russian/Eastern positive vs Western negative" pattern that some racetams (piracetam, phenylpiracetam) show. The mechanism story is consistent across regions; the clinical efficacy story is consistently underwhelming.
▸ Verdict change log
- 2026-05-05 — Initial verdict: OPTIONAL-ADD (PRN niche), verdict-confidence LOW. Mechanism (mGluR + GABA-B + cholinergic chronic upregulation) is genuinely interesting and distinct from acute racetam profiles; safety record at biohacker doses (5-30 mg) is acceptable; sourcing is solvable at $25-50/mo. But: clinical evidence is mixed-to-negative (failed Phase 3 vascular dementia, failed ASCEND Phase 2 ADHD, signal-finding only in Nobias 22q11.2DS), the biohacker dose range has never been tested clinically, the genotype-specific responder hypothesis is not validated by controlled trial data, and the upside ceiling at 5-30 mg AM is "subtle anxiolytic, motivation-neutral" — does not displace anything in V4/V5. Verdict would upgrade to STRONG-CANDIDATE if (a) Nobias Phase 2b/3 hits in 22q11.2DS, AND (b) Dylan's June 2026 23andMe results show clear mGluR-network variants. Verdict would downgrade to SKIP-FOR-NOW if Nobias program fails or if any controlled trial in non-22q11.2DS population fails.
▸ Open questions / gaps Open
- Does the chronic-upregulation mechanism produce meaningful subjective effects at 5-30 mg/day in healthy adults? No clinical data, biohacker corpus is consistent but variable. A 4-week n-of-1 trial could resolve for an individual.
- Does the genotype-specific responder hypothesis hold up in a controlled trial outside 22q11.2DS? Nobias is not currently planning trials in non-22q11.2DS populations; ASCEND was the last attempt and it failed. Probably won't be re-tested for years, if ever.
- What is the true rebound risk profile of chronic fasoracetam dosing in healthy adults? Reports range from "no rebound at any dose" to "phenibut-like severe withdrawal." Likely dose- and duration-dependent, but no controlled discontinuation study exists.
- Pharmacogenomic stratification: which mGluR-network variants predict response? Elia 2018 used "mGluR Tier 1 variants" — definition not fully standardized. ASCEND used 8 specific mGluR CNVs. No published responder-allele signature exists.
- Long-term safety past 6 weeks of consistent dosing. No human data. Receptor adaptation is documented in rats (up to 28 days). Chronic healthy-adult use at biohacker doses has zero published safety data.
- Does the cholinergic enhancement mechanism produce meaningful cognitive enhancement at sub-clinical biohacker doses? Predicted yes, biohacker reports say "subtle cognitive smoothing" — under-powered for any objective conclusion.
- Re-search trigger: Dylan's 23andMe results land ~June 5-15, 2026. At that point, re-check mGluR network gene status (GRM1-8, GRIA1-4, GRIN1-2B, SHANK3, downstream signaling) and re-evaluate verdict. Also re-check Nobias trial pipeline status (Phase 2b initiation timing, any new readouts).
▸ Sources (full, with our context)
Foundational pharmacology and mechanism
- Fasoracetam — Wikipedia — drug summary, code names, full development chain, mechanism overview, current status.
- DrugBank — Fasoracetam (DB16163) — pharmacology summary, indication history.
- AdisInsight — Fasoracetam (Avalo Therapeutics) — full development history including Avalo discontinuation 2018.
- NCATS Inxight Drugs — FASORACETAM — chemical and regulatory metadata.
- Drug Approvals International — Fasoracetam — Nippon Shinyaku Phase 2/3 history, dose ranges 100-800 mg.
Clinical trial evidence
- Elia et al., Nature Communications 2018 — Fasoracetam in adolescents with ADHD and glutamatergic gene network variants disrupting mGluR neurotransmitter signaling — foundational positive open-label signal, n=30 adolescents, CGI-I 3.79→2.33 (p<0.001), PK 4-7 h half-life across 50-800 mg single-dose.
- PMC version of Elia 2018 — open access.
- PubMed Elia 2018 abstract — official abstract.
- Aevi Genomic Medicine ASCEND topline — BioSpace 2018 — the ASCEND failure: AEVI-001 100-400 mg BID, both Part A (n=69, mGluR CNV) and Part B (n=109, no CNV) failed primary endpoint. Program terminated.
- Pharmafile — Aevi share price crashes 75% following ASCEND failure — context on the magnitude of the negative result.
- BioCentury — Aevi plummets after ADHD candidate fails in Phase II/III — analyst framing.
- Nobias Therapeutics Phase 2 NB-001 results (PRWeb 2023) — primary endpoint (safety) met, key secondary CGI-I 3.34 vs 3.69 placebo p=0.07, responder rate 1.4-1.7× placebo.
- Nobias Phase 2 detailed press release — design specifics.
- Nobias FDA Orphan + Rare Pediatric Disease Designations Dec 2024 (PRWeb) — FDA designations granted.
- Nobias FDA registrational endpoint alignment June 2025 (PRWeb) — CGI-I-22q endpoint agreed for future registrational trial.
- Nobias Therapeutics pipeline page — current development status, expansion opportunities.
- ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05290493 — NB-001 in 22q11 Deletion Syndrome — Phase 2 trial registration.
- ResearchGate — Fasoracetam for Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Children with 22q11.2DS, A Randomized Crossover Phase II Clinical Trial (2025) — peer-reviewed write-up of the Nobias Phase 2.
Safety / interactions
- Owen et al., Journal of Critical Care Medicine 2018 — Phenibut Overdose in Combination with Fasoracetam: Emerging Drugs of Abuse — the published case report: 27yo M, 10g phenibut + ~5g fasoracetam, GCS 3, bradycardia HR 36, atropine + transcutaneous pacing, day 2 hallucinations + delusions of grandeur. Mechanism: GABA-B upregulation amplifies GABA-B agonism.
Sourcing and biohacker references
- Kimera Chems — Fasoracetam — research-chem sourcing reference. CAS 110958-19-5.
- Amino USA — Fasoracetam — alternative vendor.
- Benchchem — Fasoracetam — lab-grade reference standard.
- BOC Sciences — Fasoracetam — institutional supplier.
- Nootropics Reference — Fasoracetam — biohacker dosing aggregation.
- Wholistic Research — Fasoracetam — biohacker write-up (treat with vendor-copy skepticism, consistent themes).
- Mind Lab Pro — Fasoracetam Benefits, Risks, Side Effects — secondary biohacker reference.
- Braintropic — Fasoracetam Review — secondary biohacker reference.
- Holistic Nootropics — Fasoracetam — secondary biohacker reference.
Project codebase
NOOTROPICS-ENCYCLOPEDIA-2026-05-05.md§ Racetams — entry summarizing fasoracetam at 20-200 mg dose range, GABA-B + glutamate framing.compounds/_TO-RESEARCH-QUEUE.md— fasoracetam item now resolved by this file.